Generation (3.90 GHz, 3 MB Intel Smart-Cache), INTEL Core i7-9700F 8Core bis 4,7GHz ohne Prozessor Graphics LGA1151 300 Series 65W, Intel NUC Barebone BOXNUC8I3BEK Core i3-8109U - 2X DDR4 SO-DIMM Max. CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench. You can select more than one device. The system on a chip (SoC) has an integrated LTE cellular chip. vs. Intel Pentium G4560 . Help us by suggesting a value (Intel Celeron N4000), Unknown. The Intel Celeron N4000 is a dual-core SoC primarily for inexpensive notebooks and was announced late 2017. Review; Differences; Performance; Specs ; Comments; Review. Share links. For example, when playing a game the more powerful cores will be used to increase performance, whereas checking email will use the less powerful cores to maximize battery life. If you found the comparison useful please consider sharing it: Specifications. It is manufactured in an improved 14nm FinFET process at Intel. Chipsets with a higher number of transistors, semiconductor components of electronic devices, offer more computational power. NX bit helps protect the computer from malicious attacks. Similar processors use the same socket and architecture as i3-7020U and N4000, but their performance and other characteristics are a bit different. Intel Celeron 3865U remove from comparison. Similar to the Apollo Lake predecessor, the chip is manufactured in a 14 nm process with FinFETs but offers slightly improved processor cores, double the amount of L2 cache, a smaller package, a new generation of monitor outputs (Gen 10) and a partly integrated WiFi chip. Compared to the more expensive Core Y processors, especially the single thread performance is much lower in the Gemini Lake based SoCs. Intel Celeron N4000 vs. Intel Core i3-3210 Auf dieser Seite haben wir versucht, möglichst umfassende Daten und Fakten über den Intel Celeron N4000 und den Intel Core i3-3210 zusammen zu tragen. vs. Intel Pentium Silver N5000. vs. Intel Pentium Gold G5420T. The power consumption is rated at a TDP of 15 Watt and can be configured down to 7.5 Watt for thin and light designs (with a lower performance). Dynamische Frequenzskalierung ist eine Technologie, die es dem Prozessor erlaubt, unter leichter Last Leistung einzusparen und leiser zu laufen. The architectural differences are rather small compared to the Skylake generation, therefore the performance per MHz should be very similar. Privacy policy, Unknown. Newer versions support better graphics. Intel Core i3 5005U vs Celeron N4000. Finde heraus welches besser ist und dessen gesamt Leistung in der Mobil-Prozessor-Bestenliste. If you found the comparison useful please consider sharing it: Specifications. The "Number of cores / threads" graph displays the number of cores (darker area). 0.37 fps . Intel N4000 vs i3-7167U : Intel i3-7020U vs N4020 Intel i3-7020U vs N4100 Intel i3-7020U vs N4120. Intel N4000 vs i3-2125 : Intel i3-2120 vs N4020 Intel i3-2120 vs N4100 Intel i3-2120 vs N4120. Intel Celeron N4000 vs. Intel Core i3-3130M Auf dieser Seite haben wir versucht, möglichst umfassende Daten und Fakten über den Intel Celeron N4000 und den Intel Core i3-3130M zusammen zu tragen. Search. vs. AMD Ryzen 5 1400. vs. Intel Pentium Silver N5000. Gene... INTEL Core i7-9700F 8Core bis 4,7GHz ohn... Intel NUC Barebone BOXNUC8I3BEK Core i3-... Intel Core i3-6100 Prozessor der 6. The Intel Celeron 3865U is an ULV (ultra low voltage) dual-core SoC based on the Kaby-Lake architecture and has been launched in th Intel Celeron N4000 vs. Intel Core i3-6157U Auf dieser Seite haben wir versucht, möglichst umfassende Daten und Fakten über den Intel Celeron N4000 und den Intel Core i3-6157U zusammen zu tragen. The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported. vs. Intel Core i3-7100. Intel Celeron N4000. It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores. Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor's single-core performance. By continuing to browse our site, you agree to our use of cookies. The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information. BT & WiFi ohne OS, Intel NUC nuc7pjyh BGA 1090 1.5 GHz j5005 UCFF Barebone Schwarz (UCFF, BGA 1090, Intel Pentium Silver, 1,50 GHz, j5005, 14 NM), INTEL Celeron G3950 3,00GHz LGA1151 2MB Cache Boxed CPU, Intel BX80677I57400 CPU Core i5-7400 Processor 6M Cache, bis zu 3.50 GHz grau, Intel Core i3-9100 3, 6 GHz (Coffee Lake) Sockel 1151 – Boxed, Intel Core i3-7100 Prozessor der 7. This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory. In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. Intel® Celeron® N4000 Prozessor: Spezifikationen, Benchmarks, Funktionsmerkmale, Intel® Technik, Rezensionen, Preise und Bezugsquellen. Dadurch möchten wir Ihnen einen objektiven Vergleich der beiden Prozessoren ermöglichen. It runs at 1.1-2.6 GHz (Single Core Burst, Multi Core Burst maxes out at 2.5 GHz) and is based on the Gemini Lake platform. Share links. vs. Intel Pentium Silver N5000. Intel Core i3 1005G1. The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). 37 points. More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU. It also allows you to run 64-bit apps. Please share our article, every link counts! VS. Intel Celeron N4000. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information. N4200. vs. Intel Core i5-3330. When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance. vs. Intel Core i3-7100. A small form factor allows more transistors to fit on a chip, therefore increasing its performance. Versus uses cookies to improve your experience on the site. Produkt Shop Preis; Intel 3.70 GHz Core i3-6100 3M Cache Pro... Intel 3.70 GHz Core i3-6100 3M Cache Processor (BX80662I36100) (Renewed) $137.99: Zum Angebot: Intel 3.70 GHz Core i3-6100 3M Cache Pro... Intel 3.70 GHz Core i3-6100 3M Cache … This can provide powerful performance or increased battery life respectively. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information. Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N4000 → 100% n=25 Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-7130U → 173% n=25 The processor architecture was slightly reworked and is now called Goldmont Plus. This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread. Intel Celeron N4000 vs Celeron N3350. The chip also includes an advanced video engine with hardware support for the playback of VP9 and H.265 material (8-bit color-depth). Intel Core i3-7167U vs Intel Celeron N4000 vs Intel Core i3-7020U - Benchmarks, Tests and Comparisons This page is currently only available in English. (Source: Primate Labs, 2021). 13.08 mPixels/s. Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. We consider a smaller height better because it assures easy maneuverability. Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11), - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU, Celeron N3350 (2 cores 1.1 - 2.4 GHz, 2 MB L2, Apollo Lake), Intel UHD Graphics 600 (12 EUs, 200 - 650 MHz), Quick Sync, AES-NI, max. A 32-bit operating system can only support up to 4GB of RAM. GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data … Intel Celeron N4000 vs. Intel Core i3-4020Y Auf dieser Seite haben wir versucht, möglichst umfassende Daten und Fakten über den Intel Celeron N4000 und den Intel Core i3-4020Y zusammen zu tragen. Dynamic frequency scaling is a technology that allows the processor to conserve power and reduce noise when it is under a light load. It offers two CPU cores clocked at 2.7 GHz (without Turbo Boost) and integrates HyperThreading to work with up to 4 threads at once. Intel Celeron N4000. Intel Core i3-6100U. 32GB - 1x m.2 22x42/80 No-Cord, Intel Core i3-6100 Prozessor der 6. VS. Intel Core i3 5005U. vs. AMD A4-5000. Help us by suggesting a value (Intel Core i3-5005U) When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance. Besides two CPU cores, the chip also includes a DirectX 12 capable GPU as well as a DDR4/LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel, up to 2400 MHz). Was ist der Unterschied zwischen Intel Core i3-7020U und Intel Celeron N4000? Core i3 4010U. If you found the comparison useful please consider sharing it: Specifications. Intel Core i3 1005G1 vs Celeron N4000. Help us by suggesting a value (Intel Core i3-6100U). Compare to the older Core i3-7100U, the i3-7130U offers a 300 MHz improved clock speed. It features an increased level 2 cache (to 4 MB). Overview Prices Specs + Add to comparison. Core i3 4010U. 2. The width represents the horizontal dimension of the product. vs. Intel Pentium Silver N5000. OpenGL ES is used for games on mobile devices such as smartphones. 58 … smartphones smartwatches headphones tablets. Similar processors use the same socket and architecture as Core i3-2120 and N4000, but their performance and other characteristics are a bit different. Dadurch möchten wir Ihnen einen objektiven Vergleich der beiden Prozessoren ermöglichen. Intel Celeron N4000. Similar microprocessors use the same socket and architecture as Intel i3-6006U and Mobile Celeron N4000, but their performance and other characteristics are slightly different. Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU's multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene. In this setup, a processor can utilize all cores at the same time, or just a single core for low-intensity tasks. The graphs below show the difference between Mobile Celeron N4000 and i3-10110U most important features. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information. The CPU performance of the Celeron N4000 is thanks to the slightly revised CPU architecture and the 200 MHz higher boost clock slightly better than the old Celeron N3350 (2 cores 1.1 - 2.4 GHz, 2 MB L2, Apollo Lake). vs. Intel Core i7-3770K. #0 checking url part for id 9426 +0s ... 0s, #1 checking url part for id 9178 +0s ... 0s, #2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s, #3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Intel Core i3-7100. Based on 98,721 user benchmarks for the Intel Celeron N4000 and the Core i3-8100, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 1,288 CPUs. Dadurch möchten wir Ihnen einen objektiven Vergleich der beiden Prozessoren ermöglichen. Core i3 4010U. Benchmarks Real world tests of N4200 vs Core i3 4010U. Small semiconductors provide better performance and reduced power consumption. Heterogeneous Multi-Processing (HMP) is a more advanced version of big.LITTLE technology. With integrated graphics you don’t need to buy a separate graphics card. It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance. Intel NUC BOXNUC7CJYH2 Celeron J4005 UHD... Barebone Intel NUC6CAYH (Celeron J3455) ... Intel NUC nuc7pjyh BGA 1090 1.5 GHz j500... INTEL Celeron G3950 3,00GHz LGA1151 2MB ... Intel BX80677I57400 CPU Core i5-7400 Pro... Intel Core i3-9100 3, 6 GHz (Coffee Lake... Intel Core i3-7100 Prozessor der 7. Intel Core i3-6100. Intel Celeron N4000 vs Intel Core i3-6100U, 43.59% higher single-core Geekbench 5 result, Intel NUC BOXNUC7CJYH2 Celeron J4005 UHD Graphics 600, Barebone Intel NUC6CAYH (Celeron J3455) inkl. The height represents the vertical dimension of the product. Based on 28,299 user benchmarks for the Intel Celeron N4000 and the Core i3-8130U, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 1,286 CPUs. 5.24 mPixels/s. General overview and … Find out which is better and their overall performance in the mobile chipset ranking. The SoC includes a dual channel DDR4 memory controller and Intel HD Graphics 620 graphics card (clocked at 300 - 1000 MHz). CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection) N4200. (Source: Primate Labs, 2021) N4200. Help us by suggesting a value (Intel Core i3-5005U) Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor's multi-core performance. The Intel Core i3-7100U is a dual-core processor of the Kaby-Lake architecture. A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s. Review; Differences; Performance; Specs; Comments; Review. Halo semuanya kali ini saya upload video #TanyaYuda yg di ambil berdasarkan komentar kalian kemudian saya buat versi videonya. These characteristics, together with an IPC (instructions per cycle) number, determine how well a CPU performs. Share links. Intel Celeron N3350. en. That means the per-clock-performance should be a bit better, but not near the Core CPUs like Kaby Lake Y. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server. Similar to the predecessor, Intel specifies the TDP with 6 Watts (SDP 4.8 Watts – Scenario Design Power). vs. AMD Athlon 200GE. Dadurch möchten wir Ihnen einen objektiven Vergleich der beiden Prozessoren ermöglichen. CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench. Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU's single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene. LTE is capable of downloading at faster speeds than older, 3G technology. Dadurch möchten wir Ihnen einen objektiven Vergleich der … The UHD Graphics 600 (Gemini Lake) is based on Intel's Gen9 architecture, which supports DirectX 12 and is also used for the Kaby Lake / Skylake / Apollo Lake graphics adapters (like HD Graphics 520). Still for basic tasks like office suits, browsing with light multitasking the processor performance should be fine. This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads. 6.52 mHash/s. Review; Differences; Performance; Specs ; Comments; Review. DirectX is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics. We compared two 2-core laptop CPUs: the 2 GHz Intel Core i3 5005U against the 1.1 GHz Celeron N4000. Intel Celeron N4000 vs Intel Core i3-7020U vs Intel Celeron N4100 - Benchmarks, Tests and Comparisons What is the difference between Intel Core i3-6100U and Intel Celeron N4000? Intel Core i3-6100U. Intel Celeron N4000. We compared two 2-core laptop CPUs: the 1.1 GHz Intel Celeron N4000 against the 1.1 GHz Celeron N3350. 6.63 mHash/s. Intel Core i3-6100. vs. Intel Core i3-7100. Intel N4000 vs i3-6167U : Intel i3-6006U vs N4020 Intel i3-6006U vs N4100 Intel i3-6006U vs N4120. Home > Mobile chipset comparison > Intel Celeron N4000 vs Intel Core i3-6100U. VS. Intel Celeron N4000. vs. Intel Pentium Silver N5000. AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption. Preisvergleich. We compared two 2-core laptop CPUs: the 1.2 GHz Intel Core i3 1005G1 against the 1.1 GHz Celeron N4000. i3-10110U vs N4000 specifications comparison. Intel Celeron N4000 vs. Intel Core i3-4030U Auf dieser Seite haben wir versucht, möglichst umfassende Daten und Fakten über den Intel Celeron N4000 und den Intel Core i3-4030U zusammen zu tragen. 64-bit allows more than 4GB, giving increased performance. We compared two 2-core laptop CPUs: the 2.2 GHz Intel Core i3 8130U against the 1.1 GHz Celeron N4000. vs. Intel Pentium Gold G5400. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB. The SoC is not replaceable as it is directly soldered to the mainboard. We consider a smaller width better because it assures easy maneuverability. 1. hat dynamische Frenquenzskalierung. Hat NX-Bit. Using big.LITTLE technology, a chip can switch between two sets of processor cores to maximize performance and battery life. The chip can therefore be cooled passively in theory, but SKUs with fans are possible as well. Eigenschaften. Equipped with 12 EUs and a clock of up to 650 MHz, the performance should be roughly on par with the older HD Graphics 500 (Apollo Lake). Generation (3,70 GHz, 3 MB Intel Smart-Cache), Intel Core i3-7350K Prozessor BX80677I37350K (4 MB SmartCache, 4.20 GHz) grau, INTEL Core i3-8100 3,6GHz LGA1151 6MB Cache Tray CPU, Intel Core i3-8100 Prozessor (6 MB Cache, 3,60 GHz). (Source: Primate Labs, 2021), Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor's multi-core performance. 1.02 fps. More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking. Categories. The download speed is a measurement of the internet connection bandwidth, representing the maximum data transfer rate at which a device can access online content. A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance. Created at Wed, 17 Feb 2021 12:06:53 +0100 +0s ... 0s, #6 getting avg benchmarks for device 9426 +0.003s ... 0.017s, #7 got single benchmarks 9426 +0.009s ... 0.027s, #8 getting avg benchmarks for device 9178 +0s ... 0.027s, #9 got single benchmarks 9178 +0.009s ... 0.036s, #10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.036s, #11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.058s ... 0.095s. Intel Celeron 3865U vs Intel Celeron N4000 vs Intel Core i3-7167U - Benchmarks, Tests and Comparisons Intel Core i3-7020U vs Intel Celeron N4000 vs Intel Core i3-7100U - Benchmarks, Tests and Comparisons vs. AMD Ryzen 3 2200G. 8 GB Dual-Channel DDR4/LPDDR4-2400, Dual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI.